An insurer books $120 million in loss reserves. One actuary must sign a statement telling regulators whether that number is reasonable, and put professional reputation behind it. What that signature legally means, and what it demands, is the whole of this lesson.
The insurer's board appoints a Qualified Actuary as the Appointed Actuary. That actuary signs the Statement of Actuarial Opinion on the reserves for unpaid claims and unpaid claim adjustment expenses. The opinion is filed with the statutory Annual Statement, due by March 1 following the reporting year.
The NAIC requires this opinion in every state that adopts the model annual-statement instructions. Regulators rely on it because they cannot re-estimate every insurer's reserves. The signature transfers a professional's judgment into the solvency-monitoring system.
KEY: The SAO covers the reasonableness of held reserves. It is not an audit, not a guarantee of adequacy, and not an opinion on the whole balance sheet.
Every SAO has the same three-part backbone plus an identification paragraph.
Common mistakes
- Treating an RMAD disclosure as an inadequate opinion. Reserves can be reasonable and still carry an RMAD. In Example 1 the $120 million reserve was reasonable despite a $20 million adverse-deviation risk.
- Reading the RMAD test both ways. A gap above forces the finding, but a gap at or below does not rule it out. Qualitative risks can still create an RMAD.
- Thinking carried reserves must equal the point estimate. The standard is falling within the range, not matching the $128 million point estimate. A reserve anywhere from $115M to $140M was reasonable in Example 1.
Bottom line
- The Appointed Actuary signs the Statement of Actuarial Opinion (SAO) on P&C loss and loss-adjustment-expense reserves, filed with the Annual Statement by March 1.
- Five opinion types: reasonable, inadequate (deficient), redundant (excessive), qualified, and no opinion.
- Reasonable means carried reserves fall within the actuary's range of reasonable estimates; below the range is inadequate, above is redundant.
- The actuary must test for and disclose a Risk of Material Adverse Deviation (RMAD), stating the materiality standard used and its basis.
Exam shortcut
For opinion type, draw a number line: place the low and high ends of the range, then drop the carried reserve on it. Inside is reasonable, left of it is inadequate, right of it is redundant. No arithmetic needed beyond the comparison. For RMAD, compute the high-end estimate minus the carried reserve and compare it to the disclosed materiality standard.
The full lesson (about 2,583 words, 17 min read) adds 2 worked examples, all 7 common mistakes, a self-check, free in the app.
Learning objectives
- C6
Browse all free Exam 6U lessons or jump into free Exam 6U practice questions.