A firm reports 14.2% annualized returns over five years but excludes terminated portfolios and shows only its best account. A prospective client cannot fairly compare that record with a competitor's complete results.
The Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) promote fair representation and full disclosure of investment performance. They address selective account inclusion, inconsistent return calculations, and misleading reporting periods. In the opening scenario, the omitted accounts make the advertised record unrepresentative regardless of whether 14.2% was calculated correctly for the selected account.
GIPS compliance is voluntary. Prospective clients benefit from more comparable performance records, and investment firms benefit from a common basis for competing across markets. Compliance does not establish superior investment skill or guarantee future returns.
A firm must meet all applicable requirements to claim compliance. Requirements use must; recommendations use should. Following some provisions or disclosing a departure does not permit a partial compliance claim. Document the firm's policies and procedures and apply them consistently.
For GIPS purposes, the firm is the distinct business entity held out to clients or prospective clients.
Common mistakes
- Claiming partial compliance. GIPS is firm-wide. A firm cannot claim compliance for equity strategies while excluding fixed income. The claim is all-or-nothing. Trap: "The firm is GIPS-compliant for its equity composites."
- Overstating verification's assurance. Verification assesses firm-wide policy design and implementation. It does not certify any composite's numbers. A performance examination provides composite-level assurance. Trap: "The composite returns are guaranteed accurate because the firm has been verified."
- Misclassifying discretion. Actual, fee-paying, discretionary separately managed accounts must be in composites. Non-discretionary portfolios are excluded. The violation is labeling a portfolio "non-discretionary" to remove an underperformer. Trap: "Correctly excluded because it was classified as non-discretionary", when the classification was changed because of poor performance.
Bottom line
- GIPS promotes fair representation, full disclosure, and comparability; compliance is voluntary and firm-wide.
- Define the firm meaningfully and apply documented discretion criteria based on the ability to implement the strategy.
- Composites group similar strategies; include eligible fee-paying discretionary accounts without selecting on performance.
- Terminated portfolios retain their historical contribution through the last full measurement period.
Exam shortcut
When a GIPS scenario excludes an account, identify the reason and the affected period. Separate a genuine strategy restriction from poor performance, and separate ending future inclusion from deleting past results. For assurance claims, underline what was examined: the whole firm's processes or a specified report. For fee questions, compare the actual deduction with the model deduction before rejecting the model itself.
The full lesson (about 2,765 words, 18 min read) adds 2 worked examples, all 6 common mistakes, a self-check, free in the app.
Learning objectives
- gips
Browse all free CFA Level I lessons or jump into free CFA Level I practice questions.