A branch reports flat sales and flat headcount, but its overtime line jumped 38% year over year. Nothing in the financial statements is out of balance. Analytical review is how you notice anyway.
Analytical review is the study of relationships among data to identify where actual results differ from what you expected. You form an expectation, compare it to the recorded amount, and investigate the gap. The technique produces direction, not proof. It tells you which accounts, locations, and periods deserve detailed testing.
Every analytical procedure, whether it works on ratios, variances, or trends, has the same four moving parts: an expectation, a recorded value, a difference, and a threshold that decides whether the difference matters.
KEY: An analytical procedure without a pre-set threshold is not a procedure. Decide before you look what size of variance triggers follow-up, or you will rationalize whatever you find.
Five families of techniques appear on the exam. Each answers a different shape of question.
Common mistakes
- Reading raw dollar growth as deterioration. Receivables up 56.5% is meaningless until sales growth of 25.0% is removed. Only the ratio produced the interpretable 11.5-day figure.
- Calling two data points a trend. Trend analysis needs three or more periods. A prior-to-current comparison is variance analysis wearing the wrong label.
- Treating a benchmark gap as a finding. A 13-percentage-point margin gap against peers is a question. Differing accounting policies and fiscal calendars explain many gaps before any control weakness does.
Bottom line
- Analytical review compares a pre-formed expectation to a recorded amount and directs testing; it never supplies the finding by itself.
- Ratios remove scale, variances measure a gap against a named benchmark, trends need three or more periods, benchmarking needs an external reference.
- Nonfinancial drivers (units shipped, labor hours, headcount, transaction counts) corroborate financial amounts because they sit outside the accounting system.
- Match the objective's verb: compare units means ratio, explain against plan means variance, date the change means trend, assess competitiveness means benchmarking, verify the recorded amount means nonfinancial correlation.
Exam shortcut
Read the objective first, the data second. The verb in the objective eliminates three of four answer choices before you touch a number. Stem signals: "compared with other branches" means ratio or common-size, because sizes differ. "Against the approved plan" means variance. "Over the past 36 months" or "when did it begin" means trend. "Industry average" or "peer group" means benchmarking.
The full lesson (about 2,012 words, 13 min read) adds 2 worked examples, all 6 common mistakes, a self-check, free in the app.
Learning objectives
- 5
Browse all free CIA Part 2 lessons or jump into free CIA Part 2 practice questions.