CMA Part 2 · Financial Statement Analysis · Free Lesson

Comparative financial statement analysis

Free IMA CMA Part 2 (Strategic Financial Management) lesson in Financial Statement Analysis. 13 min read, ~1,899 words.

A CFO sees revenue up 16% and asks whether that is good news. One line in one period cannot say. Comparative analysis turns raw statements into findings by scaling every line, tracking it across periods, and naming the driver behind the trend.

Common-size restates every line as a percent of a base in the same period. The base is fixed by statement: income statement uses net sales (revenue) = 100%; balance sheet uses total assets = 100% (equivalently, total liabilities + equity = 100%). Cost of goods sold (COGS) at $60M on $100M revenue is 60%. Inventory at $8M on $80M total assets is 10%. Once everything is a percent, a $50M firm compares directly to a $5B firm because size is normalized out.

KEY: The income-statement base is revenue, the balance-sheet base is total assets. Scaling expenses to net income or assets to equity is a common distractor.

What common-size statements reveal:

Read the full lesson, free →
Worked examples and practice. Free with a free account, no card.

Common mistakes

Bottom line

Exam shortcut

When the question compares companies of different sizes or asks about cost structure, the answer is vertical (common-size) analysis. Scale to revenue (IS) or total assets (BS). When the question asks about multi-year strategic progress, use fixed-base horizontal analysis (index = 100). For operational variance versus last year, use rolling-base year-over-year percent change.

The full lesson (about 1,899 words, 13 min read) adds 2 worked examples, all 5 common mistakes, a self-check, free in the app.

Learning objectives

Browse all free CMA Part 2 lessons or jump into free CMA Part 2 practice questions.