An actuary models losses as exponential with mean $5,000 and computes the expected payment above a $1,000 deductible as $4,000. That shortcut only works for some distributions. Apply it blindly to a Pareto or uniform loss and the premium is materially wrong.
Every coverage modification calculation reduces to limited expected values. From 1a:
Your task is to evaluate for specific distributions using:
For with mean :
The expected excess above deductible :
HIGH-FREQUENCY: The exponential per-payment mean is always , regardless of the deductible. This is the memoryless property. The deductible only affects frequency, not severity.
For a layer from to :
Common mistakes
- Forgetting the memoryless property. For exponential, the per-payment mean is always . If your per-payment answer differs from , you have an error.
- Using the wrong Pareto LEV formula. Two-parameter Pareto has in the denominator. Single-parameter Pareto has a different formula. Mixing them changes the answer entirely.
- Omitting the limit's effect on per-payment mean. Without a limit, Pareto per-payment is . With a limit, it is smaller. The unlimited value is a trap distractor.
Bottom line
- Exponential: ; per-payment mean is always (memoryless)
- Pareto: , per-payment severity increases with
- Uniform on (0,b): , valid only while
- Layer payment: works for all distributions
Exam shortcut
For exponential, skip the LEV, jump straight to . For Pareto, compute the survival ratio first and evaluate it numerically. Most errors creep in when computing this ratio. "EXP stays the same" (exponential per-payment equals , always. "Shift theta by d") Pareto per-payment is .
The full lesson (about 2,659 words, 18 min read) adds 5 worked examples, all 5 common mistakes, a self-check, free in the app.
Learning objectives
- 1b
Browse all free Exam FAM lessons or jump into free Exam FAM practice questions.