An auto insurer covers 10,000 policies. It needs the expected total payout and how wildly that total could swing. Getting either wrong by 5% misprices the entire book. Two frameworks dominate: the collective risk model (random claim count, i.i.d. severities) and the individual risk model (fixed policyholders, each with own claim probability).
HIGH-FREQUENCY: The collective risk model mean/variance formulas appear on nearly every FAM exam.
is random, are i.i.d., is independent of the .
Mean: .
Variance (law of total variance):
First term: process variance. Second term: mixing variance.
KEY: Process variance captures severity variability (how big each claim is); mixing variance captures frequency variability (how many claims occur). Both must be computed separately, they are not interchangeable.
HIGH-FREQUENCY: For compound Poisson ():
Common mistakes
- Using wrong variance formula for compound Poisson. General: . Poisson simplifies to . Applying the Poisson shortcut to NB frequency is wrong.
- Confusing with . In , you need the second raw moment. unless .
- Forgetting to square in mixing variance. The term is . Omitting the square gives wrong units.
Bottom line
- Collective: , with and
- Compound Poisson shortcut: , because
- Individual: over a fixed policyholders, with
- Individual variance (fixed benefit): , using rather than
Exam shortcut
When given and , jump straight to . Do not waste time computing first. For non-Poisson frequency, you need the full two-term formula, always check which distribution follows. "ENE-X" (E of S = E[N] times E[X]. "Process + Mix") process variance from severity variability, mixing variance from frequency variability. "Poisson means equal", the two terms collapse.
The full lesson (about 1,941 words, 13 min read) adds 4 worked examples, all 5 common mistakes, a self-check, free in the app.
Learning objectives
- 2i
Browse all free Exam FAM lessons or jump into free Exam FAM practice questions.