You computed and for 500 Poisson-frequency claims. To estimate the probability that total claims exceed a specified amount, FAM uses normal and lognormal approximations. Their suitability depends on the aggregate model and the requested threshold.
Choose the normal or log-normal approximation according to the aggregate model and the requested tail. Both methods match the aggregate mean and variance, but the log-normal model also preserves positive support.
HIGH-FREQUENCY: The normal approximation for aggregate claims is one of the most heavily tested mechanics on FAM.
A central limit approximation is supported when many independent finite-variance contributions produce a roughly symmetric aggregate:
Use when many independent contributions and limited skewness support the approximation, or the problem explicitly requests it. A large expected claim count alone is insufficient.
TRAP: The normal approximation is symmetric and assigns positive probability to , which is impossible for aggregate claims. For small portfolios or highly skewed severities, this can materially distort tail probabilities.
Common mistakes
- Forgetting to take the log when standardizing lognormal. Standardize , not . Using gives a z-value in the hundreds.
- Confusing lognormal parameters with mean/variance of . The parameters and are the mean and variance of , not of . The mean of is .
- Using instead of in compound Poisson variance. , not . Compute first.
Bottom line
- Normal: . Suitable when many independent finite-variance contributions yield a roughly symmetric aggregate.
- Lognormal: match moments, solve , . Standardize , not .
- Lognormal preserves positive support and right skewness. Compare both tail probabilities at the requested threshold; neither is always larger.
- Both need same inputs: and from LO 2i.
Exam shortcut
Write and immediately and box them. For lognormal, compute first, it uses only . If your right-tail answer exceeds 0.5 when , something is wrong. "Log then look" (take log of , then look up . "Sigma-squared first." "1 minus Phi") every tail probability question subtracts from 1.
The full lesson (about 1,825 words, 12 min read) adds 3 worked examples, all 5 common mistakes, a self-check, free in the app.
Learning objectives
- 2j
Browse all free Exam FAM lessons or jump into free Exam FAM practice questions.