You computed and for 500 Poisson-frequency claims. Now: "What is the probability total claims exceed $600,000?" The exact compound Poisson CDF has no closed form. You need an approximation you can look up in a normal table. Two dominate FAM: normal (fast, large portfolios) and lognormal (better for skewed, smaller portfolios).
HIGH-FREQUENCY: The normal approximation for aggregate claims is one of the most heavily tested mechanics on FAM.
By the CLT, when is large:
Use when: is large ( roughly), severity not extremely skewed, or the problem instructs "use normal approximation."
TRAP: The normal approximation is symmetric and assigns positive probability to , which is impossible for aggregate claims. For small portfolios or highly skewed severities, this can materially distort tail probabilities.
Match and to a lognormal:
Common mistakes
- Forgetting to take the log when standardizing lognormal. Standardize , not . Using gives a z-value in the hundreds.
- Confusing lognormal parameters with mean/variance of . The parameters and are the mean and variance of , not of . The mean of is .
- Using instead of in compound Poisson variance. , not . Compute first.
Bottom line
- Normal: . Fast, works when is large.
- Lognormal: match moments, solve , . Standardize , not .
- Lognormal captures right skewness. Normal is symmetric (assigns probability to ).
- Both need same inputs: and from LO 2i.
Exam shortcut
Write and immediately and box them. For lognormal, compute first, it uses only . If your right-tail answer exceeds 0.5 when , something is wrong. "Log then look" (take log of , then look up . "Sigma-squared first." "1 minus Phi") every tail probability question subtracts from 1.
The full lesson (about 1,700 words, 11 min read) adds 3 worked examples, all 5 common mistakes, a self-check, free in the app.
Learning objectives
- 2j
Browse all free Exam FAM lessons or jump into free Exam FAM practice questions.