Problem Preview: An actuary prices a whole life policy at 6% interest, then the yield assumption drops to 5%. Under constant force : jumps from to , a 12.5% increase. One percentage point of interest rate change, millions of dollars in reserve impact across a portfolio.
HIGH-FREQUENCY: The recursion is the primary tool for analyzing single-age assumption changes.
Higher → lower → every discounted payment is worth less → both and decrease.
KEY: Higher interest decreases all present values, both insurance and annuity. No exceptions. This is the one directional rule with no ambiguity.
Under constant force: . Increasing makes the denominator larger, reducing .
Common mistakes
- Getting the direction wrong for mortality on annuities. Higher mortality = shorter lifetimes = fewer annuity payments = lower annuity values. Not "more risk = higher value."
- Applying a change at every age when only one is affected. If changes but does not, then stays the same. Use the recursion at age 70 only.
- Forgetting that changes when interest changes. The second moment uses . If changes, changes too.
Bottom line
- Interest up lowers both and , since heavier discounting shrinks every present value
- Mortality up raises but lowers ; insurance and annuities move in opposite directions
- Mortality down lowers and raises
- The recursion isolates single-age changes:
Exam shortcut
For directional questions, the constant force model gives instant answers: is increasing in and decreasing in . For quantitative single-age changes, use the recursion shortcut: . If the approach requires recomputing entire tables, stop and look for the recursion. "Insurance and annuity: mortality opposites." "Interest affects everything the same way, down." "Recursion: v-q plus v-p-A."
The full lesson (about 1,693 words, 11 min read) adds 3 worked examples, all 5 common mistakes, a self-check, free in the app.
Learning objectives
- 9d
Browse all free Exam FAM lessons or jump into free Exam FAM practice questions.