An underwriter gets a positive genetic test. The population mortality rate is 2%, but this applicant is not randomly drawn, the test changed the information set. is not . Confusing the two is the prosecutor's fallacy.
Restrict the sample space to outcomes where occurred. Then measure how much of that restricted space is also in .
HIGH-FREQUENCY: The exam tests this both ways, computing from joint and marginal, and computing from a conditional and marginal.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule:
Conditional probability is a valid probability measure, all three axioms hold:
- Countable additivity for mutually exclusive events
Common mistakes
- Confusing with . (defect rate). (source probability). Answering 0.05 when asked for the source probability is the prosecutor's fallacy. Trap: 0.05.
- Dividing by the wrong marginal. , not . The denominator is always the conditioning event. Trap: instead of .
- Not computing via total probability. You need the denominator. If you only have conditional probabilities and class sizes, you must sum across the partition first.
Bottom line
- Definition: ; the denominator is always the conditioning event.
- Multiplication rule: .
- in general; equating them is the prosecutor's fallacy.
- Conditional probability is itself a valid probability measure: complement, inclusion-exclusion, and Bayes all apply within it.
Exam shortcut
When a problem gives conditional probabilities and asks for a "reverse" conditional, you need Bayes' theorem. Start by computing the denominator via total probability. Setting up correctly is 80% of the work. "Given = Given the denominator." The event after the bar () is always the denominator. Prosecutor's fallacy check: Before writing your answer, ask: "Am I computing P(disease | positive) or P(positive | disease)?"
The full lesson (about 3,462 words, 23 min read) adds 5 worked examples, all 8 common mistakes, a self-check, free in the app.
Learning objectives
- 1f
Browse all free Exam P lessons or jump into free Exam P practice questions.