A policyholder filed 2 claims last year. The underwriter needs the posterior probability this person is high-risk, that determines the premium increase. Conditional probability in the random variable setting drives every Bayesian classification on Exam P.
For events defined through , such as and :
The intersection simplifies: , so .
Given event with :
If , this is truncation and renormalization:
HIGH-FREQUENCY: The law of total probability and Bayes' theorem applied to random variables are tested constantly, often via a "prior on a parameter."
Common mistakes
- Forgetting to normalize. The posterior is likelihood times prior divided by total probability. Reporting the numerator (0.0251) instead of the posterior (0.4965) is a common error. Trap: 0.0251.
- Wrong Poisson formula. . Forgetting the for doubles the answer. Trap: 0.5020 instead of 0.2510.
- Applying memorylessness to non-exponential distributions. Given for a Pareto, you cannot say . Trap: 0.8133 instead of 0.7037.
Bottom line
- Same formula, variable-defined events:
- Nested events: when , ; never multiply the two survival probabilities
- Memoryless property: , exponential and geometric ONLY
- Left-truncation: , rescale density by survival at the truncation point
Exam shortcut
"Given survival to time " or "given loss exceeds ", immediately check: is it exponential? If yes, invoke memoryless. If not, compute . "Bayes = Likelihood times Prior, then Normalize." Write L-P-N at the top. "Memoryless means Exponential or Geometric, nothing else." Pareto, Weibull, uniform, normal: full conditional required.
The full lesson (about 2,255 words, 15 min read) adds 2 worked examples, all 6 common mistakes, a self-check, free in the app.
Learning objectives
- 2b
Browse all free Exam P lessons or jump into free Exam P practice questions.