The gamma density looks intimidating with its , but the exam rarely makes you integrate it. For integer shape, a gamma probability is just a Poisson sum, the same terms you already know.
with shape and scale :
, . You rarely integrate this. Instead, read the parameters off the form: the power on is , and the exponent gives .
When , the gamma is the exponential Exp(). More generally, for integer , a Gamma() is the sum of independent Exp() variables. That is why claim-waiting-time problems, which add up exponential gaps, produce gammas.
A Gamma() with integer is the waiting time for the -th event in a Poisson process of rate . So a gamma tail is a Poisson sum:
Common mistakes
- Integrating the gamma density by hand. For integer , the Poisson connection replaces the integral with a finite sum. Reach for it before integrating.
- Flipping the inequality in the Poisson connection. : the continuous lower tail maps to the discrete UPPER tail. The waiting time is short exactly when many events have already occurred.
- Confusing scale and rate. SOA uses scale with . A rate parametrization uses with . Read the density's exponent to get .
Bottom line
- Gamma(): shape , scale . , .
- Read off the density: the power of is ; the exponent is .
- is the exponential; a Gamma() is the sum of independent Exp().
- Poisson connection (integer ): ; equivalently .
Exam shortcut
Read and straight off the density (power on is , exponent is ), then and . For a probability with integer , convert to a Poisson() sum. "Gamma tail is a Poisson sum." Lower tail of maps to the upper tail of the Poisson, and vice versa. "Power plus one is the shape."
The full lesson (about 1,683 words, 11 min read) adds 2 worked examples, all 6 common mistakes, a self-check, free in the app.
Learning objectives
- 2a
- 2b
- 2c
- 2d
- 2e
- 2f
Browse all free Exam P lessons or jump into free Exam P practice questions.