Free GARP FRM Part II Market Risk Practice Questions

Market Risk Measurement and Management carries 20% of GARP FRM Part II (GARP). Questions cover non-parametric and extreme value approaches to VaR, backtesting and VaR mapping, validating VaR models, how correlations behave and bottom-up correlation modeling, regression hedging and principal component analysis, term structure models (drift, volatility, Vasicek and Gauss+), volatility smiles and surfaces, and the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book.

233 questions 46 easy 104 medium 83 hard 2026 syllabus

Sample Questions

Question 1 Easy
Which statement about the Vasicek and Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (CIR) short-rate models is correct?
Solution
B is correct. The Vasicek model has constant volatility σ\sigma, so the short rate is Gaussian and places positive probability on negative values. The CIR model has diffusion σr\sigma\sqrt{r}, which collapses to zero as r→0r \to 0; under the Feller condition 2kθ≥σ22k\theta \geq \sigma^{2}, the short rate stays strictly positive.
Question 2 Medium
Since the 1987 equity-market crash, implied volatilities for S&P 500 index options at a given expiration typically exhibit which pattern across strikes?
Solution
C is correct. Post-1987 equity index options display a pronounced negative skew (often called a smirk). Out-of-the-money puts (low strikes) trade at meaningfully higher implied volatilities than at-the-money or out-of-the-money calls (high strikes). This reflects the market's pricing of crash-risk and heavier left-tail risk-neutral density than the lognormal assumed in Black-Scholes.
Question 3 Hard
A portfolio's daily P&L is normally distributed with zero mean. The one-day 95% parametric VaR is $1 million. Using z0.95=1.645z_{0.95} = 1.645, z0.99=2.326z_{0.99} = 2.326, and assuming square-root-of-time scaling, the 10-day 99% expected shortfall is closest to:
Solution
D is correct. First back out the dollar standard deviation from the given 95% VaR: σV=$1,000,000/1.645=$607,903\sigma V = \$1{,}000{,}000 / 1.645 = \$607{,}903. Next, the daily 99% expected shortfall multiplier under normality is ϕ(z0.99)/(1−0.99)=0.02665/0.01≈2.665\phi(z_{0.99})/(1-0.99) = 0.02665/0.01 \approx 2.665, where ϕ\phi is the standard normal density. Then daily 99% ES =2.665×$607,903≈$1,620,000= 2.665 \times \$607{,}903 \approx \$1{,}620{,}000. Scaling to a 10-day horizon by 10≈3.162\sqrt{10} \approx 3.162 gives $1,620,000×3.162≈$5.12\$1{,}620{,}000 \times 3.162 \approx \$5.12 million.

Guides & Articles

About FreeFellow

Jeffrey Ting, founder of FreeFellow
Jeffrey Ting
FSA, CFA · Founder

FreeFellow was built by Jeffrey Ting, a credentialed actuary and CFA charterholder who has passed thirteen of the hardest exams in finance, all on his first attempt. He paid four-figure prep fees along the way.

So he started writing his own questions, then lessons, then mock exams, until it grew into a full prep platform covering 40 exams with more than 46,000 original practice questions.

01
Cost shouldn't decide who gets in.

A CFA charter, a CPA license, an actuarial credential. Each opens a real career, but prep fees add to the cost of getting there. FreeFellow keeps its original question bank and written lessons free so you can study even if a paid course is out of reach.

02
Free should mean free.

The original question bank, the worked solutions, the topic lessons, mixed practice, and your readiness score stay free, forever. Full access needs a free account, and practice usage limits apply. Fellow adds AI grading on supported exams, spaced-repetition flashcards, full-length mock exams, analytics, and a study plan that adapts to your progress.